KITT: same trans am or something new?????

Archive for discussions from 2005. Please post new discussions in the appropriate forum.

Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro

Locked
User avatar
sickrick05
Volunteer
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:07 pm
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

KITT: same trans am or something new?????

Post by sickrick05 » Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:46 pm

hi, I'm new here and I have a quiestion

I heard that there might be a new Knight Rider movie proposed to be made soon. I'm wondering if they should stick to the same Trans am from the 80's or should they go for a noew look for KITT

I really like the original 80's look I didn't really like the "KR 2000 Movie" look. But I was think why don't they modify it with a newer version of the trans am series like the 2001 trans am. Or maybe some other sports car that might be coming out in the future. What do you guys think?

User avatar
Knight-Armen
FLAG Assistant
Posts: 878
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:29 pm
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Location: Sweden

Post by Knight-Armen » Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:34 am

Well... I agree with you. The Trans-Am from the 80's is really better looking than the Dodge Stealth in Knight Rider 2000, IMO.
In a interview David were asked if they were to bring back the Trans-Am from the 80's and he said:

- Well... same car and new car!

That dosen't say much does it? The reason is that they simply haven't put the story together yet. The first draft however is to be done by the original producer Glen A. Larson, that is for sure. And recently the producers claimed that they didn't want the car to talk!
David told them that, either he makes a movie with the car talking or he dosen't! That is probably it! I really don't know anything more than that... but we really hope that they won't spoil the movie as they did with Knight Rider 2000. That movie was a real discrase. O, and one more thing, if you wanna know the source just look at the old posts or just go to the site moviehole.net However they might have moved the Knight Rider News so you might have a hard time finding it, and it's no idea of mailing them beacuse they won't answer. Believe me I've tried several times!
Michael: Kitt what matters to me is who you are not what you look like. Sure we don't have the car so we can't turbo boost so we can't go over 200 miles an hour but it was all icing on the cake anyway

Lyn
FLAG Operative
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:34 pm
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Location: Spokane, WA
Contact:

Post by Lyn » Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:18 am

I think they should stick with the original design for KITT and get a different design for that other car.
One thing about KITT that should be changed, though:
have KITT be equipped with a hybrid(half-gas, half-electric) engine.
That will make KITT be environmentally friendly and up-to-date in time for this "Knight Rider" movie.

User avatar
KOPP
Rookie
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 8:28 pm

Post by KOPP » Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:59 pm

^^KITT never really ran on normal gas, anyway, so they don't have much to change as far as that's concerned, anyway. And they should keep his 80's look, because new cars are stupid, and 80's cars are sleek, thin, and have style. All new cars are designed to be "cool" and therefore have that "thick" kind of look to them, to blend in with the "thug car" Jap look. I hate new cars.
"Knight Rider 2008 - A brain-rotting flight into the mind-numbing world of a poor excuse for a television show...that should not exist!"

FIGHT the quest for Season 2 - spare us the trash!!

knightdogg
Rookie
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 2:50 pm

Post by knightdogg » Sat Jun 18, 2005 5:24 pm

Kitt should be the same Trans Am because if movies like Dukes of Hazzard and Starsky & Hutch can use their old cars why not Knight Rider.

C_Matt
Volunteer
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:18 pm
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Contact:

Post by C_Matt » Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:34 pm

'Tis true.

User avatar
sickrick05
Volunteer
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:07 pm
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by sickrick05 » Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:46 am

I definitly think that the original 80's trans-am forms the character of KITT. No other model or make would ever be able to be KITT. It would be interesting to see another car along with KITT.

User avatar
Arjun
Operative
Posts: 244
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:24 am
What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
Location: Mumbai, India

Post by Arjun » Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:21 am

KOPP wrote:^^KITT never really ran on normal gas, anyway, so they don't have much to change as far as that's concerned, anyway. And they should keep his 80's look, because new cars are stupid, and 80's cars are sleek, thin, and have style. All new cars are designed to be "cool" and therefore have that "thick" kind of look to them, to blend in with the "thug car" Jap look. I hate new cars.
I fully agree with that. Cars from the 80's were sleek, thin, with a good mix of curves and lines. In comparison, cars from the 2000's and even a few of the 90's just have one curve too many, and some look fat. They all look like ugly, sloppy eggs! Look at what happened to our Honda City- it was a nicely designed car earlier, but now it's got this outrageous and extra-ugly spaceship look!

These days, I sketch many original car designs, and there is always a clear 80's influence in every one of them. Designs from the 50's and the 60's (large, flamboyant, decorative) were not too bad either, though the 70's cars were too boxish. But nothing lke the cars of the 80's. Then came the decline in quality of design with the Japanese cars. The newer Trans Ams don't look so bad, but I would still prefer the 1982 designs. New Ford Mustang- UGH!!!!!

Locked