
I've stayed away from spoilers as much as I can, but have read the general feelings towards each episode as the shows have been broadcast in the States. Now, I read your opinions on 'Knight In Shining Armor' and expected a terrible episode... but actually, while it wasn't the best thing I've seen recently (and the show's definitely gotten a lot better even in the first 6 episodes I've seen so far) it wasn't all that bad!
I think the problem lies with the reasons behind the "plot" of this episode. Usually a series will leave big twists and turns for their characters until mid-season(-ish) but GST felt he had to get a lot of things out of the way first, one example being Mike Traceur becoming Michael Knight. Now, while I can understand the theory behind putting this episode out first, the main point of it seems to be (apart from the Traceur/Knight thing) throwing out a lot of twists and turns for the characters, making you unsure of their true intentions... things like that. The problem I think, is that we hadn't gotten to know any of the characters first! Afer all, this is episode one!
Because I've read quite a bit, I know a little about the characters going in, so maybe that's why I enjoyed this episode more than I thought I would, but for anyone watching it when it first went out, it must've felt very strange. They seemed to want to forcefully deepen the characters and give them twists but without you being familiar with them first it must've felt like a right mess of an introductory episode! Am I right?
Basically, imagine you got to know the characters over the other episodes and then this appeared mid-season, do you think you would've appreciated it more?
For me, 3 out of 5. Good, but the plot's a bit of a mess and trying to fit in too much (and that subway train station bit with KITT is terrible!)