89IROCNDoug wrote:Thank you, Matt, for more side-by-side pictures of the Mustang and concept Camaro.
No problem mate, you can find a shed load of additional high quality pictures
here.
89IROCNDoug wrote:If the Camaro was as boxy and retro-looking as the Mustang, then I would agree that there is some major hypocrisy going on here.
But looking at those pictures, the Camaro is much sleeker, smoother, and futuristic-looking than the Mustang. Yeah, GM used the Mustang when they designed the next Camaro and also has some retro styling, but they sure look different to me! They have some similarity on the sides and some general size dimensions, but that's it. The front end, rear end, and hoods are completely different!!! Then there's the lower roofline on the Camaro, which I hope they can keep in the production car.
If the Mustang was more streamlined like the concept Camaro or if they would of at least took some time and modernized the front end and made it look more aero I would be happy with the KI3000 being a Mustang. The prototype Giugiaro Mustang I saw in this forum would of worked great in my opinion!
It’s hard to disagree with your analysis of the Mustang, but I’m afraid I must respectfully disagree with your analysis of the Camaro. Whilst its profile is clearly sleeker thanks to the lower roof line, the car still shares a number of boxy qualities with the Mustang. The rear ends for instance are very similar, with the main differences being the diffuser style, taillight arrangement, and spoiler. The sides of each car even share styling similarities, although in this case, the sleekness edge has to go to the Mustang thanks to the Camaro’s very angular styling. Without a doubt, the rooflines and fronts ends are where the main differences lie, but even then, the front ends still share glaring similarities, such as grill and headlight placement. The main difference between each of the front ends is definitely the sloped leading edge featured on the Camaro, which just so happens to have a conveniently placed grill that would be perfect for an eight bar scanner to be situated.
Whilst I would choose the Camaro due to my personal fondness of its styling if I was given a choice between it and the Mustang, I think it’s fair to say that the Mustang is getting a bit of a poor shake. Both are retro styled muscle cars, even if the Camaro doesn’t take quiet as many styling cues from its 1969 predecessor as the Mustang takes from it first generation counterparts.
To me, having viewed all of the pictures of the Knight 3000 that Neil provided us with, the main thing I see wrong with the Mustang is it’s lack of blacked out tail lights and rims on the standard version, and, and I say this with all my heart, the disgrace that is the attack mode, which somehow manages to make the Trans Am’s Super Pursuit Mode look good, which is something that it certainly is not.
89IROCNDoug wrote:If you got some people who didn't know anything about car companies and models and were familiar with Knight Rider (difficult task, I'm sure!!!) and had them choose the next KITT from those pictures, I guarantee the concept Camaro would win by a landslide!
Oh, I agree completely with your sentiments, and I adore the current style of Mustang, and am a particular fan of the Ford Shelby GT, which is of course based off the Ford Shelby GT-H. The Camaro just looks that much better from my perspective, and perhaps Ford feel the same way since they’re currently in the process of giving the fifth generation Mustang a serious makeover.
Matt
Welcome aboard the Knight 2000.
Thank you. What's all this, it looks like Darth Vader's bathroom?