Explain Bionic Woman.Mr.Marcus wrote: Make KR dark and give it great writers and you have a better chance of creating a series that will catch on.

Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
Explain Bionic Woman.Mr.Marcus wrote: Make KR dark and give it great writers and you have a better chance of creating a series that will catch on.
That's no guarantee, really. A show about a talking car is inevitably going to be viewed under that "ridiculous" and "stupid" light. If you darken it up and focus on high-quality writing, you're pretty much looking at widening the target audience and hoping it will catch on.KR08 once again proves that today's audiences aren't embracing light, fun, and stupid anymore in a scripted series. Make KR dark and give it great writers and you have a better chance of creating a series that will catch on.
Very simple. There will always be exceptions to any given rule, scenario, course of action, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. The only absolutes in life are death and taxes. Focusing on the exception and then presenting that as a valid counterargument is what the losing side of an argument does all the time.Sky_Blue_Civic wrote:Explain Bionic Woman.Mr.Marcus wrote: Make KR dark and give it great writers and you have a better chance of creating a series that will catch on.Dark doesn't always mean better. All it will do is make KR seem like every other show on TV.
Back to the original topic point, the article. It was pretty spot on with regards to moving with Chuck. The two shows would work well together and have the same target audience.Mr.Marcus wrote:Very simple. There will always be exceptions to any given rule, scenario, course of action, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. The only absolutes in life are death and taxes. Focusing on the exception and then presenting that as a valid counterargument is what the losing side of an argument does all the time.Sky_Blue_Civic wrote:Explain Bionic Woman.Mr.Marcus wrote: Make KR dark and give it great writers and you have a better chance of creating a series that will catch on.Dark doesn't always mean better. All it will do is make KR seem like every other show on TV.
Make it seem like every other show on tv? You mean make it actually good and engaging? Rather than the usual "Its getting better" line that people comment every week which implies that the show isn't that good to begin with.
Hmm...I didn't think of it that way. Good point.taoworm2323 wrote:We have to remember too that Knight Rider in the 80's was not campy.
But looking back on it it is campy in retrospect ONLY because it was aired in the 80's.
Likewise THIS version of KR will be campy 15 years from now without them trying to be.
Make it serious and it will be campy by default years from now.
Try and make it campy...and you got the power rangers..
We don't want that for KR. lol
i just got a chance to really read your argument and i have to say I agree! and isn't it interesting that both versions of KR debuted during a "recession"? just a thought...FLAGCEO wrote:The article makes another excellent point - that Knight Rider is really the only fun escapist show on television.
Look at the past 25 years and consider it in light of economic trends and the general psychological state of our society.
When times are bad, however, reality TV takes a backseat - we need something to distract us away from the reality that surrounds us. That's why the A-Team, Knight Rider, Viper, Airwolf, Battlestar Galactica, Twilight Zone, and other shows that took us to a different world where good triumphed over evil, where the hero comes and saves the poor, ordinary shlep being beaten up by the thugs of a super-rich villan, did so well.
We are again in that time when escapism is what primetime TV is all about. This formula is what makes it more light-hearted, fun, and as the article points out, ridiculous. That's what we need right now.