Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Archive for discussions from 2009. Please post new discussions in the appropriate forum.
Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
-
Dukeboy320
- Rookie
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:38 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
-
Contact:
Post
by Dukeboy320 » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:27 pm
-
Jay_n1
- Operative
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:03 pm
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
-
Contact:
Post
by Jay_n1 » Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:05 am
What's so bad about it?
-
kwsta25
- Rookie
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:08 pm
Post
by kwsta25 » Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:03 am
Hes right the car is nice but not for 40,000 dollars. First of all does not look like an 82 but thats not the issue. Looks like its a gta model trans am maybe 85 and up. The spoiler is the wrong one needs changing, the taillights um waaaaaaaaay off for a replica. needs the earlier model trans am rear lights from 82 to i think 84. Plus the tinted tailight cover. the exaust what are they thinking. The interior just has the dash non of the electronics come with it which those are the most expensive parts to buy if your building a replica. seats are recaro but WRONG ONES. also the ground effects arent supose to be there. So for 40,000 even tho thats a beautiful car id call it a bad replica.
AND LETS SAVE KNIGHT RIDER 2008 WE NEED PPL TO TUNE IN THIS WED OR ELSE THE NEW KITT IS HISTORY:(
-
PHOENIXZERO
- FLAG Special Ops
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:20 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: MI
Post
by PHOENIXZERO » Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:26 am
A topic about it was made a few days ago here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13454" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It's very, very, very bad, even worse is how it's advertised. >_<
The new and again improved evil's advertisement is currently too long and too badass to display here. But let's just say that with now 50% more evil, this **** is great!

-
jup
- FLAG Operative
- Posts: 1781
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- antispam: No
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 1982
- Location: SD, CA. USA | Web site: http://www.jupircbot.8m.com (jup's KR game project 'ghosts' here)
-
Contact:
Post
by jup » Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:36 am
The further down I scrolled, the more shocked I was to see how truly bad the conversion was. The interior looks like it was drawn by Tron, for pitty's sake.
-
Knight2000
- FLAG Recruit
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: UK
Post
by Knight2000 » Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:47 am
Agreed- it looked atrocious.
Even from the first pic, I knew there was something wrong and it looked like it had been botched together. The other pics merely confirmed my suspicions.
For $40k, I'd expect a 100% fully-working, fully-matched replica in near-excellent condition.