1.) HOW DID CHARLES GRAIMAN AFFORD TO BUILD THE KNIGHT 3000?? WHY EVEN BUILD IT AT ALL?
Seriously, he just got bored and built it in his garage? I guess we can assume the FBI was involved? But why? It makes no sense at all. This was poorly done. Why not have it built by FLAG, there's no reason explained why it was closed down, or any good story reason to tell it like that.
2.) At the beginning of the movie, Graiman escapes his home and starts running through the forest. After this scene many things happen, it's daylight, KITT and Sarah drive for HOURS to Vegas. Then suddenly CUT BACK TO CHARLES RUNNING THROUGH THE FOREST IN THE DARK!! Damn! He must be tired!
If this was supposed to be a flashback, poorly edited.
3.) WHY DOES SARAH START SHOOTING A MACHINE GUN AT THE CAR WITH HER DAD IN IT!? WHY DOES MIKE DECIDE IT'S SMART TO LET THE CAR SMASH INTO KITT AND RISK CHARLES' LIFE??
Aside from these things (feel free to list your own) there were several problems with the film. I liked it a lot but here's my list of grievances.
1.) KITT did nothing interesting, at all.
2.) The not being armored when the computer is off is ridiculous. This is a step backwards from the Knight 2000.
3.) The writing was terrible. "It certainly didn't come from the dealership!"
4.) None of KITT's features were used. I don't count GPS and Internet as features. My laptop in a car can do that. I don't count the color changing either, the effect was terrible, and no one WANTS to see KITT looking like a regular car. Pointless! Knight Rider 2000 pulled this off much better showing the features of the Knight 4000.
5.) Attack mode.... what? KITT didn't attack ANYTHING. It's a SPOILER! And it just appears out of thin air. At least in the show "VIPER" the car transforming looked plausible somehow. This with the spoiler "growing" out of nothing makes no sense, and looks terribly fake.
Make the car do something cool, and stop making KITT talk like a robot. KITT is supposed to sound human. It's ok to let him use contractions, ok?
Sorry I'm done now.
