Victor Kros wrote:
- So let me get this straight, are you wishing to say that this statement is inaccurate? As a matter of opinion I have a right to say what I wish as long as its respectful and complies with the rules. I am expressing that right. Your response was less than respectful. If you have something useful to contribute to the topic, I'm all ears.
I must apologize, I was not meaning disrespect.
In all honesty, it was mockery.
Not of your opinions, but of you bias.
Victor Kros wrote:
Furthermore when you compare 5 minutes of screen time to about over an hour of screen time collectively with Trust Doesn't Rust and K.I.T.T. vs. K.A.R.R., the original K.A.R.R. was both superior in character development, verbal comprehension, and presentation (you actually had K.A.R.R .interacting with K.I.T.T. in verbal exchanges, you saw K.A.R.R'.s VOX, etc.)
But the thing is, this episode was only promoted to be a transistion to FLAG, using KARR as the means to do so.
While I do feel they disrespected the original KARR, they had to find away of making a use out of him for this series.
And, in the long run, what they discussed of the KARR project in this episode opens the doors for KARR to come back.
First, KARR was the NSA's little baby, like they'll give their creation up that easily?
In fact we learned that the KI3T project was created for the sole purpose was for the inevitible return to KARR.
Right there it gives the new KARR a real back story, a tie to Mike's, KR&D's and FLAGs past.
True, the character itself was used more as a plot device, but the fact they left KARR out of so much helped the fact it was aquick fight for a throw away character. But I dont think it's that important in the long run. They gave KARR a history, we know what he has done and why he was out for no good.
And as a whole in the series, since KARR was introduced, he provided something the show needed, a focus point. It gave them something to aim for in getting us to FLAG.
For that, I believe KARR was utilized for what they created him for.
Victor Kros wrote:
Given that they did not actually link this new KARR(E) to the original KARR save for one line spoken by Billy which was then contridicted later by Graiman, I stand by my original view that this was a "pale copy" of the original name and character persona.
How can it be a pale copy? Because it didnt have that many lines? Cause it was only there for a few minutes?
Cause he didnt quote the original show word for word?
I think we're let down because you cant compete with an original evil, and they didnt try.
They did what they've been doing since the show started, giving us little nudges to the original but not letting it take everything completely over.
The original KARR was a throw-away character. He was only brought back by fan demands.
That was the nail in the coffin. They should have kept KARR dead after TDR, bringing him back after he fell off a cliff and blew up was stupid. Did they ever give us an explanation how it survived?
That why I have no problem with there being a new KARR.
Because the first one is gone. We all have made up theories and crazy stupid explainations for 20 some years, but when it comes down to it..... what the hell is the point.
It's a TV show. About a TALKING CAR. That DRIVES ITSELF. And JUMPS 10 FEET IN THE AIR WITH A PUSH OF A BUTTON!!
It's not rocket science, or Pulitzer winning. The show isn't going to set a new standard for broadcast television. How can it be so obsessive?