You're welcome. I'm not an expert, but I've icked a lot of this stuff up over the years.
And we should all hope for CD releases, not downloads -- sorry
Mr. Peake, it's not good news.
FSM's release sounded better than Hitchcock MEdia Records' simply because FSM had the money and experienced people to master the tapes better, with tricks of their trade, and programs not so affordable to HMR.
Peake's scores would sound just as good (unless on an inferior medium) had it been done by a popular label wit hthe money and know-how.
These guys snope around vaults -- when allowed in -- call people hunt, relentlessly hunt down tapes, bake tapes (that are stuck together over time, on certain mediums) in an oven to prepare for mastering; wait patiently for rights issues to be cleared up (indeed, on more than one occassion Intrada Records, for example, said they've had to wait eight years for a CD to finally get released), and put their love and time into a project.
Downloads aren't a great thing. For starters: many releases are limited to availability in the world; certain releases can only be purchased by U.S. customers, for example.
Often you can only pay with credit cards or alternative online sources like PayPal, which, contrary to popular opinion, not everybody uses (and even when they do, they use it for certain things, and not everyday purchases).
You have inferior download qualities, and even if they offer FLAC or some lossless alternative, the costs varies and downloads sometimes fail or miss tracks and then you got to deal with a conglomerate like iTunes -- good luck with that.
Right now, as I recall, the fees for downloaded music as per AFM re-use fees, is lower, meaning the musicians get paid less. But that is subject to change eventually. Once score CD's are downloaded more than pysically bought, the AFM will create special high fees or equivilant fees, for downloads, and then you'll be paying for the same or mroe for a download, often in inferior bitrate, and not get liner notes or anything signed. Never mind there's no re-sale value (the re-sale of downloads, as is being tried now, will fail hard. With a vegeance) and when in a pinch and needing some extra cash, you got budkis.
Oh, and if a hard drive full of music fails, you lose everything. If a CD goes bad or gets scratched to hell, you lose just that one CD.
And we certainly, at least people like myself, don't want to encourage online downloads of scores.
La La Land Records is the best bet. Contact information:
http://www.lalalandrecords.com/info.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It also makes me wonder about these previous, incomplete scores, where some were missing some great cues. Is it not because of selecting tracks for the CD, but rather they were taking what they could find from
Peake's tapes? Meaning they didn't even go into the vaults. My guess. I could be wrong of course.