Would you buy a 1982 TransAm?
Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
- Army_F_Body
- FLAG Assistant
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Contact:
I think I would highly recomend the car (or a 83, or 84) to anyone doing a conversion. It just makes it easier. My late model 92 has been a pain in the rear.
As a daily driver, nope. Even new these cars I don't think were intended as daily drivers. I rember reading somewhere that the expected vehicle range was about 60k miles. Not good life expectancy. That's why I take pride in the fact that mine has over 150k miles!
As a daily driver, nope. Even new these cars I don't think were intended as daily drivers. I rember reading somewhere that the expected vehicle range was about 60k miles. Not good life expectancy. That's why I take pride in the fact that mine has over 150k miles!
KITT project is on again!
Currently working on: brand new stock tan interior, almost done!
Currently working on: brand new stock tan interior, almost done!
- Army_F_Body
- FLAG Assistant
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Contact:
everyone is entitled to an opinion, but seeing as that the unifying theme of this site is *edit: pro* Knight Rider I cannot see the point of coming in here and expressing an opinion to the contrary.
You know you will be walking into potential conflict and no matter how valid your argument may be, you will always be in the wrong.
You know you will be walking into potential conflict and no matter how valid your argument may be, you will always be in the wrong.
Last edited by Army_F_Body on Sun Jan 18, 2004 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
KITT project is on again!
Currently working on: brand new stock tan interior, almost done!
Currently working on: brand new stock tan interior, almost done!
- neps
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: nyc, usa
- Contact:
Your previous posts were deleted because they expressed "troll like" behavior. Your very first posts to this community were to knock the show with opinions, instead of fact, which is usually done by someone who does not to wish to have a debate about the show, but rather to mock it. Your account could have been deleted, as other sites probably would have done without a second thought, but we didn't do that here. It's good to see that you are trying to be a contributing member of the community, but what was done was not censorship. This is a private community, and as such the normal rules do not apply here, and we have the right to choose what topics and posts remain, and those that are purged. I'm sorry that you took offense to it but you need to realize nature of your post was not that of a pleasurable tone.
The posts were removed from here to bring this thread back to its original topic, rather than to dwell on the negativity of it. If we hadn't questioned the missing posts, then we could have continued without issue.
Anyway, back to the topic. If I had the cash, I would buy a 3rd gen trans am without question. Probably not an 82 after the points msKen raised, but I see no problem with later years of that generation. I have always wanted to build a replica, and purchasing one of those cars is really the only way. You have to realize that it is a 20 year old model line, and as such will have to be treated very delicately and not relied upon heavily. Also be weary of people selling the car for thousands of dollars more than its worth, simply cause it can be used as a donor car.
The posts were removed from here to bring this thread back to its original topic, rather than to dwell on the negativity of it. If we hadn't questioned the missing posts, then we could have continued without issue.
Anyway, back to the topic. If I had the cash, I would buy a 3rd gen trans am without question. Probably not an 82 after the points msKen raised, but I see no problem with later years of that generation. I have always wanted to build a replica, and purchasing one of those cars is really the only way. You have to realize that it is a 20 year old model line, and as such will have to be treated very delicately and not relied upon heavily. Also be weary of people selling the car for thousands of dollars more than its worth, simply cause it can be used as a donor car.
- Tony
- Rookie
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 1:01 am
- What year did the original Knight Rider start: 0
- Location: Calgary, Alberta
Anyway, back to the topic. If I had the cash, I would buy a 3rd gen trans am without question. Probably not an 82 after the points msKen raised, but I see no problem with later years of that generation. I have always wanted to build a replica, and purchasing one of those cars is really the only way. You have to realize that it is a 20 year old model line, and as such will have to be treated very delicately and not relied upon heavily. Also be weary of people selling the car for thousands of dollars more than its worth, simply cause it can be used as a donor car.
I agree with neps. These cars need TLC. and if you are willing to except that, then you will have no problems with them.
Like I said before I own a 1982 Trans Am and they intend to be a nightmare at times. The body on my car is in very good shape. The interior needs to be restored, and the engine needs to be R&R'd
But other than that I love the car.. "It looks like KITT" who wouldn't??
Tony