Page 1 of 3

What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:38 pm
by taoworm2323
I would love to sit down after the reboot and see this on TV...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW1GVDco4z8&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


In fact this is what I have expecting the whole time.

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:32 pm
by knight14
taoworm2323 wrote:I would love to sit down after the reboot and see this on TV...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW1GVDco4z8&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


In fact this is what I have expecting the whole time.
LOL throw in some Baywatch nights ehh :lol:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:17 pm
by taoworm2323
Well, I was going to throw in clips from 'Small Wonder', but I felt that was too many robots. :lol:

How's this now...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHCiNnGaKto&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


:lol:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:59 pm
by knightprobe89
wow, that 1 minute clip was better than anything i have seen in the past 8 episodes of kr08 :shock: :lol: :mrgreen: :good:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:57 am
by Knight2000
knightprobe89 wrote:wow, that 1 minute clip was better than anything i have seen in the past 8 episodes of kr08 :shock: :lol: :mrgreen: :good:
Agreed! More action and more driving in that clip than in the entire KR08 series (pilot excluded) put together.

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:12 am
by taoworm2323
Image
Knight Rider 2009 is in preproduction right now. We have one stunt car, one close up car and we are getting a wreaked one to have an inhouse dash for some shots. We are about 4 months away from shooting. It will be on youtube only. And it will be a non-profit film. For the fans.

But most of all it will have the spirit of Knight Rider. Including the voice of William Daniels. New cameras on the market now give us the chance to make something really good now. We are purchasing a Canon EOS 5D Mark II.

To see a video of it in action go here http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k54bTFKM4o43XwPvoF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(You have to sit through a 15 second ad before it will load.)
Wish us luck... :good:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:36 am
by Kaine
cool! good luck with your project!

BTW, what kind of car is that?

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:43 am
by taoworm2323
Thanks! It's a modified 1995 Camaro.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asP2mIhF3zc&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A teaser can be seen here, although Knight Rider: Drive isn't the working title anymore.
Oh and props to tobie1! :good:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE9GSDQEkGI&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:27 pm
by knightprobe89
thats awesome news, i cant wait to see your knight rider 2009 video, please let us know when you have it up on youtube, :good: :mrgreen:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:39 am
by taoworm2323
LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiVtfRhkRb8&fmt=18" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:01 am
by knightprobe89
i was watching your most recent video and i must say you did an excellent job at duplicating william daniels voice. wow :shock:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:29 am
by HisNameisGarth
uhhhh......

Should have been?

Nope.

In 2009 -- I doubt Michael Knight would slum around in a base model F-Body from 15 years ago......

At least the 1982 car was a legit performance car for its day -- not some V6 chick car base model......

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:57 am
by taoworm2323
HisNameisGarth wrote:uhhhh......

Should have been?

Nope.

In 2009 -- I doubt Michael Knight would slum around in a base model F-Body from 15 years ago......

At least the 1982 car was a legit performance car for its day -- not some V6 chick car base model......
Garthe, you're a hoot, that's what you are :)
I want to hug you in a non-sexual way and tell you that you make my heart burst of joy and cuddle up like a cute little cookie monster and ask for more milk.
I would actually see that comment as retarded, but it's hard when you're so cuddly and manly! :D

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:48 pm
by HisNameisGarth
At least the Star Trek losers (who have too much time on their hands) invest in reasonably accurate props.

The Knight Rider guys who apparently have way too much time on their hands just grab a $500 beater car and film them with their dad's camcorder. In every incarnation of Knight Rider -- the car has never been a Chevy. Get a clue?!?!

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:37 pm
by KRShelby
While an F-body..I don't believe its a Chevy.
Was that not a Pontiac?

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:50 pm
by knightny
HisNameisGarth wrote:At least the Star Trek losers (who have too much time on their hands) invest in reasonably accurate props.

The Knight Rider guys who apparently have way too much time on their hands just grab a $500 beater car and film them with their dad's camcorder. In every incarnation of Knight Rider -- the car has never been a Chevy. Get a clue?!?!
Image

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:53 pm
by Tony P Knight Driver
KITT: “Michael”

MICHAEL: “Yes, KITT”

KITT: Why is hisnemisisgarth making fun of TAOWORM232’s Car?”

MICHAEL: “Because he’s a jealous douche KITT”

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:31 pm
by taoworm2323
:lol:

Image

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:26 am
by Sky_Blue_Civic
taoworm2323 wrote::lol:

Image
ImageSo true!Not that I'm directing my opinion to anyone,but it's true in general.

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:51 am
by HisNameisGarth
Jealous of a 13 year old V6 car ($1000 beater car)? Can you actually say that with a straight face?

As a former '01 WS6 owner -- and current Z06 owner...... I almost fell out of my chair on that one.

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:33 am
by taoworm2323
Staying on topic...
Image

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:54 pm
by My_Friend_KITT
*Car Novice Here*
What is a F-dody?
Why is it so significant of insignificant?

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:41 pm
by Vegasmike
My_Friend_KITT wrote:*Car Novice Here*
What is a F-dody?
Why is it so significant of insignificant?
"F body" refers to the frame GM used to build the Trans Am, Firebird, Camaro,among others on.
:kitt2:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:42 pm
by taoworm2323
Vegasmike wrote:
My_Friend_KITT wrote:*Car Novice Here*
What is a F-dody?
Why is it so significant of insignificant?
"F body" refers to the frame GM used to build the Trans Am, Firebird, Camaro,among others on.
:kitt2:


F-Body = Sleek, long front end, ultra modern design :kitt2:
KITT = F-body :kitt2:

Re: What Knight Rider should have been..

Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:05 am
by Vegasmike
Thanks for the auto design lesson :good:
You are correct F body = :kittside: :kitt2: :karr: :kitt: