back to knight rider online home .  forum

This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Moderators: Matthew, neps, Michael Pajaro

This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby kitt34 » Nov 01, 2009 4:45 pm

This is how the real KITT Should look like.

http://www.dupontregistry.com/autos/Sea ... mid=704814

sleeker and cooler.
kitt34
Operative
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Jun 29, 2003 12:42 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby GT500KR » Nov 02, 2009 12:02 am

seriously can ppl stop with how ki3t should of been.........GM didnt want to it the 1st time, they wont do it a 2nd time
"My wife asks me, why you do those burnouts? Well.....you do it for the kids, you know, Im not being immature. You just.....well you do it for the kids."
~Jay Leno
User avatar
GT500KR
FLAG Recruit
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 10:50 pm

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby suave6565 » Nov 02, 2009 7:24 am

I would have to agree with Gt500KR also.

Without any disrespect to anyone, but im sorry these subjects are too repetitive. I don't visit this site as often as many of you do but when i do, the one post i keep seeing way too much of is how Kitt should've and would've. We were lucking to even get the mustang (which i think wasnt a bad choice). Regardless, Maybe if they start talking about the movie and putting it into production, then the idea of a kitt should come to play and what it should look like by the fans point of view. At this point, NBC has failed big time with the attempt of bringing back knight rider as a series. They haven't listened to us then and they wont now.
suave6565
Volunteer
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Jan 18, 2008 10:03 pm

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby taoworm2323 » Nov 02, 2009 12:39 pm

GT500KR wrote:seriously can ppl stop with how ki3t should of been.........GM didnt want to it the 1st time, they wont do it a 2nd time

suave6565 wrote:I would have to agree with Gt500KR also.

Without any disrespect to anyone, but im sorry these subjects are too repetitive. I don't visit this site as often as many of you do but when i do, the one post i keep seeing way too much of is how Kitt should've and would've. We were lucking to even get the mustang


Image
User avatar
taoworm2323
FLAG Recruit
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Aug 18, 2008 11:47 pm

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby Rockatteer » Nov 03, 2009 2:57 pm

Not only that, but there has been some in depth discussion about why Chevrolet couldn't be used by KR because of it's use in the Transformers movies. So for people to keep harping on about it is just stupid.
User avatar
Rockatteer
FLAG Assistant
 
Posts: 801
Joined: Jun 17, 2002 12:01 am
Location: Cyber Space

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby krrdr2010 » Nov 03, 2009 4:12 pm

It looks interesting, But they should stick with the Ford Mustang. :kitt: :kittconv: :karr:
krrdr2010
Rookie
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sep 29, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby FASTKNIGHT » Nov 04, 2009 6:43 pm

its done ..... put a fork in it :shock: ... you cant change it, and its history already. :spmgo:
2005 PONTIAC GTO
PHANTOM BLACK METALLIC
TINTED WINDOWS
TINTED TAILS
EIBACH STAGE 1 PRO KITT
User avatar
FASTKNIGHT
Recruit
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Oct 22, 2008 9:46 pm
Location: WEST OF NEW YORK CITY

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby PHOENIXZERO » Nov 05, 2009 6:07 am

kitt34 wrote:This is how the real KITT Should look like.

http://www.dupontregistry.com/autos/Sea ... mid=704814

sleeker and cooler.


Really? It's been nearly TWO F'ing years and YOU'RE STILL DOING THIS CRAP! Crawl back into your hole until you can come up with something new.
The new and again improved evil's advertisement is currently too long and too badass to display here. But let's just say that with now 50% more evil, this **** is great! :twisted: :skar:
User avatar
PHOENIXZERO
FLAG Special Ops
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Jul 19, 2006 5:20 am
Location: MI

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby honnziva » Nov 05, 2009 9:32 pm

Let's take a step back here, the whole reason for the forum is for people to be able to express their enjoyment and also dislikes, but that's with respect, take a step back and re read your posts before hitting reply.

This is a community, and we need to continue to treat each other with respect, especially those of us who have been around for over 2000 posts.
"To our future. No matter who it may take us up against or where"
User avatar
honnziva
KRO Podcaster
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sep 13, 2004 10:51 am

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby Matthew » Nov 06, 2009 3:39 am

Indeed Gene,

Unfortunately, amongst all of the repetition that can be expected on a subject like this, the people who’ve seen the majority of the discussions seem to be easily aggravated by seeing it once again.

I feel that it’s important to note that whilst those of us that are regulars will have seen these topics on more occasions than we can count, new members may not have. As a result, a better response would be to direct them to some of the more prominent discussions that have occurred over the last year or so, as that will allow them to see our thoughts on the matter, without us feeling the need to repeat ourselves. :good:

Matt
Welcome aboard the Knight 2000.

Thank you. What's all this, it looks like Darth Vader's bathroom?
User avatar
Matthew
Mission Supervisor
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Oct 11, 2002 12:01 am
Location: England

Re: This is how KI3T 2.1 should look like

Postby PHOENIXZERO » Nov 10, 2009 4:53 pm

It's not about new users bringing up this sort of thing, it's about someone who has made repeated posts about the same thing almost every time they see a topic about the car and even when it doesn't involve the car. KR08 has been done now for over six months and still, going on about the Camaro what KI3T (2.1) should look like as if it matters anymore or did in the first place. In this case (like most of them) the Camaro and there are only two reasons the Camaro even gets mentioned by most people either because it's a vehicle that's a part of the GM brand (generally GM by fanboys) or two and the most common reason, because of the air intake in the front that's a completely obvious location for the scanner.

If this topic/post didn't involve the Camaro (for what seems like the 100th time by kitt34) then great then we'd have something new here, which has been severely lacking since KR08 ended. But nope, still going on about the same damn thing since late 2007 after the Mustang (POWERED BY FORD) was introduced as the new KITT. It's gone beyond the point of ad nauseum.
The new and again improved evil's advertisement is currently too long and too badass to display here. But let's just say that with now 50% more evil, this **** is great! :twisted: :skar:
User avatar
PHOENIXZERO
FLAG Special Ops
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Jul 19, 2006 5:20 am
Location: MI


Return to KR08 General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests