Moderators: neps, Matthew, Michael Pajaro
imranbecks wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see how the rotating license plate wld be done.
PBH wrote:imranbecks wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see how the rotating license plate wld be done.
Will it have a rotating plate? Also, what episode did KITT have a rotating plate?
imranbecks wrote:Yeah... It seems this model will have more gimmicks than the ERTL one. If you remember, the ERTL KITT had that disappointing grappling hook in front which was pretty much useless actually...haha..
PBH wrote:imranbecks wrote:Yeah... It seems this model will have more gimmicks than the ERTL one. If you remember, the ERTL KITT had that disappointing grappling hook in front which was pretty much useless actually...haha..
Don't forget the passenger eject seat
imranbecks wrote:Like I said before, whatever. If you guys are not happy about it, then don't get it. So stop criticizing. We all get that its not 100% accurate. Nose, wheels etc. But at the end of it all, if you are not getting it, more power to us then coz I'm pretty sure there are many others here including myself who will be happy enough to get our hands on it once its out and add it to our collection, much like we all did when ERTL released their 1/18 KITT.PBH wrote:imranbecks wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see how the rotating license plate wld be done.
Will it have a rotating plate? Also, what episode did KITT have a rotating plate?
Yes it will. It was in the episode Brother's Keeper. In one scene, KITT changed the license plate from KNIGHT to KNI 667 as they were evading the police. I'm pretty sure the one on the model will be KNI 667 as well..
Tbird100636 wrote:PBH wrote:imranbecks wrote:Yeah... It seems this model will have more gimmicks than the ERTL one. If you remember, the ERTL KITT had that disappointing grappling hook in front which was pretty much useless actually...haha..
Don't forget the passenger eject seat
Yeah, the ejector seat that always tilted forward and never sat even with the driver's seat, and always popped forward against the windshield.
imranbecks wrote:Agreed. The scanner on that display base looks really impressive. I have high hopes on the 1/18 scanner. Judging from the video of the scanner we all saw on the unpainted prototype, it just needs to be slightly tweaked. Otherwise it looks great already. And if they decide not to change the scanner and leave it at that, I can live with that. At least it doesn't flicker like the ERTL one did.
mvgs2011 wrote:tuske427 wrote:My goodness, lots of complainers on here. It's sure easy to throw stones without knowing all the information... If you knew what it was like to communicate comments to other people to hand them off to third and fourth parties (who have never seen a third gen T/A let alone an episode of KR) to execute said comments, and do this all within an aggressive schedule (not at the convenience of your own home where you can do over and over until you're happy) and accept certain limitations due to cost, and had to accept certain sized trunk hinges and frames to pass pull tests, certain proportions adjusted to pass drop tests, etc. you might have a better understanding of why the final result might just be slightly off of what you define as "perfect". Regardless of the category- toy, adult collector, or whatever, it is required by law to pass certain tests for safety before it can be sold to consumers. These rules can, and do, affect the aesthetics. It's the world we live in and we do the best we can to work within the rules we must abide by.
Yes, there are adjustments I would still make if I could. We did our best with what we had to work with and I think it came out great. BTW the latest image posted is of a paint master sample. It's still getting slight color and detail tweaks, but that's pretty much what it is. The seatbelts are removed. I think this has a lot of cool features that no other KR replica has had before. The interior is flocked- giving it that realistic cloth feel. The seats have PMD logos on them. It has sculpting detail on the insides of the door, hatch, t-tops, etc. (I never see that on diecast vehicles) I think it raises the bar significantly. I'm proud of it. Thank you to those that did compliment it and thank you to all those that will be buying one.
IT´S A JOKE. ONLY THIS, A JOKE!
tuske427 wrote:mvgs2011 wrote:tuske427 wrote:My goodness, lots of complainers on here. It's sure easy to throw stones without knowing all the information... If you knew what it was like to communicate comments to other people to hand them off to third and fourth parties (who have never seen a third gen T/A let alone an episode of KR) to execute said comments, and do this all within an aggressive schedule (not at the convenience of your own home where you can do over and over until you're happy) and accept certain limitations due to cost, and had to accept certain sized trunk hinges and frames to pass pull tests, certain proportions adjusted to pass drop tests, etc. you might have a better understanding of why the final result might just be slightly off of what you define as "perfect". Regardless of the category- toy, adult collector, or whatever, it is required by law to pass certain tests for safety before it can be sold to consumers. These rules can, and do, affect the aesthetics. It's the world we live in and we do the best we can to work within the rules we must abide by.
Yes, there are adjustments I would still make if I could. We did our best with what we had to work with and I think it came out great. BTW the latest image posted is of a paint master sample. It's still getting slight color and detail tweaks, but that's pretty much what it is. The seatbelts are removed. I think this has a lot of cool features that no other KR replica has had before. The interior is flocked- giving it that realistic cloth feel. The seats have PMD logos on them. It has sculpting detail on the insides of the door, hatch, t-tops, etc. (I never see that on diecast vehicles) I think it raises the bar significantly. I'm proud of it. Thank you to those that did compliment it and thank you to all those that will be buying one.
IT´S A JOKE. ONLY THIS, A JOKE!
No, Marco, you are quite mistaken. This is no joke, and I really question the validity of your opinions on this diecast, especially when you base your entire argument off of one skewed photo you define as "correct" for KITT. Is your "reference pic" even from a season one episode? How about you get some screen shots of the show itself from season one and then make a comparison. I'll provide one to start:![]()
This is a screen shot from the pilot episode- right before the two thugs steal KITT for a joyride. Yes, I know, my image is slightly tweaked as it's from a camera (the DVD is copyright protected) However, anyone can easily see the front doesn't stick out so far. Furthermore- look at the tires. Notice the tall sidewalls. This is how they did it back then. You (and other folks too) are making poor comparisons because you are not comparing apples to apples and are looking at replicas built 30 years later that use current trend lower sidewall profiled tires. At the least use the correct reference before you start bashing.
imranbecks wrote:Cool it everyone. The photos of the model so far is of a prototype. So why get so worked up over them? To some of us, it looks good already. Some improvements needed such as the wheels of coz which I'm sure will look nothing like that on the prototype. Judging by the standard of the cars in the Hot Wheels Elite line, I doubt the wheels would look like the one on the prototype for the final model. So to those who aren't happy about the Hot Wheels 1/18 KITT, please kindly leave this thread alone and refrain yourself from posting anything else. There are some here who are pleased with what we have seen so far. Seeing as it is a prototype, Improvements are bound to happen on the final model. Whichever way it'll look once its released, I will still go buy it. I'm sure I won't be alone doing that.
On a side note, even if there ever will be a near accurate or 100% accurate model of KITT in the future, its people like the ones here that are criticizing it that will still mention all the minor inaccuracies. Its a toy. Its a model. Its a mass produced item. Whatever you want to call it. Its not the real car. Live with it. Its not like the custom model that you built etc etc which you all think is perfect. So enough with all of this. Where were you guys back in 2004 for the ERTL 1/18 KITT thread? I don't remember having this sort of argument in that thread.
I can't wait to get the model, then I'll post photos of it once I have it just like I did when I got my model of the 1/18 KITT and KARR back in 2004. So haters, we don't need you here.
imranbecks wrote:Cool it everyone. The photos of the model so far is of a prototype. So why get so worked up over them? To some of us, it looks good already. Some improvements needed such as the wheels of coz which I'm sure will look nothing like that on the prototype. Judging by the standard of the cars in the Hot Wheels Elite line, I doubt the wheels would look like the one on the prototype for the final model. So to those who aren't happy about the Hot Wheels 1/18 KITT, please kindly leave this thread alone and refrain yourself from posting anything else. There are some here who are pleased with what we have seen so far. Seeing as it is a prototype, Improvements are bound to happen on the final model. Whichever way it'll look once its released, I will still go buy it. I'm sure I won't be alone doing that.
On a side note, even if there ever will be a near accurate or 100% accurate model of KITT in the future, its people like the ones here that are criticizing it that will still mention all the minor inaccuracies. Its a toy. Its a model. Its a mass produced item. Whatever you want to call it. Its not the real car. Live with it. Its not like the custom model that you built etc etc which you all think is perfect. So enough with all of this. Where were you guys back in 2004 for the ERTL 1/18 KITT thread? I don't remember having this sort of argument in that thread.
I can't wait to get the model, then I'll post photos of it once I have it just like I did when I got my model of the 1/18 KITT and KARR back in 2004. So haters, we don't need you here.
mvgs2011 wrote:imranbecks wrote:Cool it everyone. The photos of the model so far is of a prototype. So why get so worked up over them? To some of us, it looks good already. Some improvements needed such as the wheels of coz which I'm sure will look nothing like that on the prototype. Judging by the standard of the cars in the Hot Wheels Elite line, I doubt the wheels would look like the one on the prototype for the final model. So to those who aren't happy about the Hot Wheels 1/18 KITT, please kindly leave this thread alone and refrain yourself from posting anything else. There are some here who are pleased with what we have seen so far. Seeing as it is a prototype, Improvements are bound to happen on the final model. Whichever way it'll look once its released, I will still go buy it. I'm sure I won't be alone doing that.
On a side note, even if there ever will be a near accurate or 100% accurate model of KITT in the future, its people like the ones here that are criticizing it that will still mention all the minor inaccuracies. Its a toy. Its a model. Its a mass produced item. Whatever you want to call it. Its not the real car. Live with it. Its not like the custom model that you built etc etc which you all think is perfect. So enough with all of this. Where were you guys back in 2004 for the ERTL 1/18 KITT thread? I don't remember having this sort of argument in that thread.
I can't wait to get the model, then I'll post photos of it once I have it just like I did when I got my model of the 1/18 KITT and KARR back in 2004. So haters, we don't need you here.
Guy, sincerely, It`s convenience. I`m sorry.
I don`t agree with You. Model cars can be like the real cars. Guys, think, How much time we waited for a 1/18 KITT?
Only in 2004 we have ERTL model. A disaster. A model all out of scale with a bizarre nose.
And now, will we accept that again? (I agree that Hotwheels model is a little better than ERTL, but not enough).

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests